Our common humanity entitles us to freedom—within broad limits—to follow what we believe to be true as our consciences say we must, even if our consciences are mistaken. In truth, they have the right to be wrong. He is a widely respected voice in the media, and… More about Kevin Seamus Hasson. Also by Kevin Seamus Hasson. See all books by Kevin Seamus Hasson. Inspired by Your Browsing History. Looking for More Great Reads?
Download our Spring Fiction Sampler Now. LitFlash The eBooks you want at the lowest prices. This is the legacy that has put us in the position in which we find ourselves today. Without that history of intolerance, there would not be the backlash that insists there is no place at all for religion in public life. One could hardly blame the Park Rangers for insisting on suppressing public displays of religion except that, in their turn, they are so very extreme.
Under the guise of religious freedom the Park Rangers have exercised their own form of oppression so effectively that ludicrous displays of celebration can be found everywhere: This in turn alarms the Pilgrims who push back even harder. Although it is clear to all bystanders that this is really about one side or the other getting their own way, both sides insist they are advocating universal religious freedom. No one on either side is practicing any true tolerance at all, just like the good old days, in fact.
That would be like opposing apple pie. By reminding us that conscience is the core of religious conviction, he takes us to the true turning point of religious liberty. It is this attitude that allows Hasson to be in the position of being both invited to Hasidic Jewish weddings and also to be a guest speaker on the Arab network Al-Jazeera. That is the attitude that will help dig America out of our internal religious wars and just possibly bring us, at long last, true religious liberty.
View all 4 comments. Nov 07, Cindy rated it really liked it. Jul 08, Julie Davis rated it really liked it. Both drive me nuts. This book is a good reminder that there is another way than always screaming at each other about extreme opposites. For some reason this shows up as a new book instead of an updated version of the old one. It does have a new chapter Sep 24, George P.
The right to be wrong : ending the culture war over religion in America
Ending the Culture War over Religion in America , 2nd ed. Paperback The story of religious freedom in America is, as Kevin Seamus Hasson tells it, the story of the conflict of conscience against Puritans and Park Rangers. While they appear contradictory at first, they make the same underlying assumption: In the public square, one does not have the right to be wrong.
Hasson narrates the year battle of conscience against its foes briskly and humorously. In New England, the Puritan establishment persecuted—through exile, torture, and execution—radicals within their own dissenting, Congregationalist tradition e. In the South, the Anglican establishment discriminated against, among others, Baptists. Other colonies—such as Rhode Island, Maryland, and Pennsylvania—were tolerant with a degree of Protestant diversity, but also drafted laws that legally privileged Protestants over Catholics and Jews.
What government gives, however, it also can take away. The latter conceives of religious freedom as something that inheres in the human person, which can be claimed against government policy. In American history, the clearest expression of the latter view—the one that prevails today—is the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which begins: Indeed, it was designed to do precisely that. But what does the incorporation of the establishment clause against the states mean when one of the express intentions of that clause was to leave state establishments of religion intact? Part Three also reflects on why it is important for government to recognize religious freedom.
There are, of course, theological arguments in favor of religious freedom, those of Roger Williams, for example. In the public square, a broader argument for religious freedom, based on widely shared assumptions, is needed. In other words, conscience arbitrates what we think to be true and what we feel to be right, and then requires us to live—socially, publicly—accordingly. Allowing people to live according to conscience creates a genuinely diverse society, one where people arrange their affairs according to their best lights, in cooperation with and without coercion by others.
Claiming religious freedom as a right for yourself entails that you recognize in others a right to be wrong at least according to your rights. Only by recognizing this right to be wrong can we end the culture war over religion, in which Puritans try to impose a one-size-fits all religion on a religiously diverse populace and Park Rangers try to scrub the public square of any reference to religion at all. The Right to Be Wrong is a short read pages of text , but it narrates the history of American religious freedom quickly and neatly summarizes the argument in favor of a broad construal of it.
Short and well-argued explication of the history, role, and status of religious regulation and religious liberty in American government.
The Right to Be Wrong
Hasson makes the complex simple by defining the extremes "Pilgrims" who want only their religious freedoms protected in public, and "Park Rangers", who want all religion banned from public places , explaining their sources, and why they are both wrong. Hasson speaks from the front line as the founder and director of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, and us Short and well-argued explication of the history, role, and status of religious regulation and religious liberty in American government. Hasson speaks from the front line as the founder and director of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, and uses examples from history and his personal legal file that exactly define the issues in easily-understood pictures.
Indeed, if my review suggests a lugubrious academic treatise of fine print, I have failed to convey the humor in this classic; it is actually fun to read. Here's the really short version: Tolerance of all religious practices, which was given some trial during the colonial days, but almost universally abandoned for establishment of state-favored religion and severe restrictions on religious expression, is not a lasting or good solution because "tolerance based solely on the government's benevolence lasts only as long, and as far, as the benevolence does.
Don't blink; you might miss it. Religious freedom must be established as a human right, which predates, precedes, and precludes legal rights and restriction. The Constitution and the First Amendment made steps towards establishing free expression as a human right, but were limited by political compromises to accommodate the needs of ratification and state's rights.
The state of judicial interpretation of the First Amendment is a mess, but one that can be informed and reformed as we remember and take seriously points 1 and 2. Mar 30, Anagha Uppal rated it really liked it Recommends it for: All, especially those interested in politics and religion. Is a society that comes to agree on all matters of conscience necessarily a better society? It should be taken for granted that two individuals who are left to discuss something as fundamental and steadfast as religion will argue. However, this does not mean that the two must take up arms to defend their stance.
This Is a society that comes to agree on all matters of conscience necessarily a better society? We humans are very social animals.
- Transgenic Models in Endocrinology (Endocrine Updates).
- A Spectacle of Dust: The Autobiography.
- OPEN THE CAGE.
- The Right to be Wrong - Ending the Culture War over Religion in America.
- Bad Banker: und das Holiri-Komplott (German Edition).
- The Right to Be Wrong by Kevin Seamus Hasson | ejisytoqys.tk.
- The Right To Be Wrong: Ending the Culture War over Religion in America | Acton Institute?
We mourn, celebrate and experience life together. A "don't ask, don't tell" policy in religious matters is therefore a repression of human nature. Instead, keeping in mind the urge we feel to experience as a community, we must be open to others finding their God in their own ways. As Hasson states, mere tolerance is no longer a valid option.
Main Menu Mobile
Humans have a natural right to believe or disbelieve whatever they prefer. This policy of acceptance can be applied to almost any sphere of life. Abortion, gay rights, and gun control are continually in the news because of their controversial nature. If a multicultural society can learn to respect everyone's opinions as his or her natural right, the world may not flare into as much violence and disillusionment as it does today. In fact, the wide variety of opinions on these and other topics is what enables us to become progressively better citizens: Everyone knows the Pilgrims came to America because they believed in religious freedom, right?
They oppressed those of other beliefs, because they believed that they alone had the truth. In The Right to Be Wrong, the author discussions the slow and incredibly painful development of the concept of religious freedom. Kevin Seamus Hasson belongs to a nonpartisan, interfaith, public law firm that protects the free expression of all religious traditions. If you enjoy history or political scie Everyone knows the Pilgrims came to America because they believed in religious freedom, right?
If you enjoy history or political science, you will enjoy the way the author causes you to think your way through American history. In a breezy style, he shows that some of the various colonies had a rudimentary concept of tolerance that excluded certain minorities, such as Catholics and Jews--or even the wrong kind of Protestants.
The Founding Fathers engaged in lively debate about the concept of rights, and whether or not they had a role in the new constitution. Their own personal practices such as Jefferson owning slaves reveal their confusion about the source and definition of rights. In other words, as humans we have the right to be wrong! Who said, "I disagree with what you say but defend to the death your right to say it? Aug 20, Dawn rated it it was ok Shelves: I received this book through the GoodReads giveaway program.
While my usual reading palate does not lean toward nonfiction, the premise of this book struck my interest as a timely discussion. Kevin Hasson presents an easy read through portions of American history that has led us to the present day polarizations between the Pilgrims the zealots loudly holding fast to their religion in the face of others and the Park Rangers those who see freedom of religion as as the freedom from the influence I received this book through the GoodReads giveaway program.
Kevin Hasson presents an easy read through portions of American history that has led us to the present day polarizations between the Pilgrims the zealots loudly holding fast to their religion in the face of others and the Park Rangers those who see freedom of religion as as the freedom from the influence of religion.
Hasson shows that this divide is long-standing. The hope that he offers is "That even when we can't agree on who God is, we can and should agree on who we are. We are each unique persons. We all thirst for the true and the good. And we all have consciences that drive us in our quest to find the true and the good, and then insist that we embrace and express publicly what we believe we've found. If we can agree on this much then we share a profound truth: The truth about man is that man is born to seek freely the truth about God. Aug 02, Jim Davis rated it liked it.
The Right to Be Wrong: Ending the Culture War Over Religion in America
The Right to be Wrong is an interesting read, but far from as interesting as it could be. While the writer Kevin Seamus Hasson gives an excellent portrait of American history, he hardly tackles the modern problems of ending the culture war in America over religion.
The book goes on ad nauseam about the plight of Pilgrims and Quakers but fails to connect the dots to our modern problems such as, faith in public schools, abortion, radical Islam, gay marriage and the forcing of Catholic hospitals to The Right to be Wrong is an interesting read, but far from as interesting as it could be.